Friday, September 09, 2011

Required Reading -- Never Forget

AT WAR

The first great war of the 21st Century began September 11, [2001], seemingly out of the blue. The United States is a target because we are powerful, rich, and good. We are resented for our power, envied for our wealth, and hated for our liberty.

Few wars begin like their predecessors. The wars of the last century opened with thrusts into Belgium or Poland, a surprise attack on battleships, a lurch in Kuwait, a steadily accreting campaign of jungle murder. This war began with four hijacked airplanes targeted at the Pentagon, Camp David, and the two World Trade Towers.

No one should think of this as terrorism, which is the effort to spread death and dismay among civilian populations. Much death and grief ensued, but the targets were precisely picked to incarnate American power, democracy, and wealth. The September Massacres were a rational attempt to thwart the will and depress the spirits of the United States.

Our enemies have proximate motives, as political and military actors always do. But let no one imagine that any American policy or lack of it, or any change in our ethnic or religious makeup, could have insulated us from such a strike. The United States is hated because we are, indeed, powerful, rich, and good. Like the temples of Rome sacked by the barbarians, or the Greenwich Observatory that was the target of anarchists in Joseph Conrad's Secret Agent, our national headquarters and totems excite the fear and wrath of those in the world who feel themselves shortchanged. For this historical moment, anyone who has a quarrel with the status quo will find us, with varying degrees of truth, somehow implicated in his discontents. Our exposure to these emotions is an unavoidable badge of honor.

Because this was an act of war, its agents must not be pursued by resolutions, lawsuits, or any of the other legalistic and diplomatic devices by which we have tried to combat terrorists in the recent past. President Bush's and Secretary of State Powell's early talk of "hunting down" the perpetrators is incomplete. These are not traffic violators to be given a desk ticket at the night court of The Hague. After the time it takes to guess the attackers' commanders, which should not be long, those commanders, and their allies and patrons, should be paved over. If our retaliatory strikes hit a few of the world's warriors who happened not to be involved in this war, that will be no great loss.

News reports showed dancing in the streets of Middle Eastern cities, graphic proof that our enemies are not restricted to cadres of ideologues or leaders. Striking the war-making capacity of hostile nations may involve clearing some of those streets. When that happens, we should not shrink. Our European allies have, in many cases, battened off deals with rogue states. They should be told that, if they continue to do so, their assets in this country may be appropriated to repair the damage done to Washington and New York City.

The vacation that began with the end of the Cold War ended with the summer of 2001. All the twittering about lockboxes, tax cuts, and compassionate this and that; all the chatter about world structures and emerging mobocracies, was the sound of locusts. The first duty of the state is to protect the national security. Salus populi suprema lex. We need our diplomats, not to attend conferences and solve the world's problems, but to cut deals that are to our advantage and explain the consequences of actions that are not; we need our military resources, not to run elections and perform social work in the BedStuys and Appalachias of the world, but to punish offenses and intimidate enemies.

The September Massacres would not, of course, have been stopped by missile defense. They were not stopped by aircraft carriers. Does that mean we should have none? No great power seems to have been actively involved, but that does not mean that a great power might not threaten one day to send four warheads somewhere. We must be prepared to meet that threat, as we prepare to repel further attacks of this kind. Such an operation was not the work of a handful of men; there had to be coordination, planning, support. Our intelligence was woefully lacking; our domestic defense capabilities need to be addressed.

Grievous as our losses have been, America has suffered worse in its history, in both pride and blood. The enemy once occupied Washington and burned the White House; the greatest killers of Americans were brother Americans in the Civil War. The systems and the character that emerged from those torments will emerge from this. The world, we have been taught, is always full of competing views. In the intellectual pine barrens of the West, there are anarchist and neo-Communist stirrings. Islam harbors a fundamentalist strain, a minority even in the Middle East, a small minority worldwide. China is modernizing the Asian road to despotism—a very old road; Confucius warned against it. These options lead to poverty and tyranny. The United States, for all its follies and sins, is the best the world has to offer.

We should therefore be of good cheer. In the darkest early days of World War II Winston Churchill told British diplomats on the European continent to light their windows, to hold the usual functions, to conduct themselves with confidence and spirit. No skulking in bunkers or military bases for him, or for us. Schedule the rebuilding of our wasted icons. Our fellow citizens are lost, but the steel and glass will come back. When it does we will hang out a million flags.

— Editors, National Review, September 13, 2001

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Killer B's

I only started following sports with any seriousness in the mid-1980's, and to the extent I followed professional hockey at all, my favorite team was the Calgary Flames. I had never been to Calgary (still haven't), and didn't know anybody who was, but I stuck with them because I absolutely despised the Edmonton Oilers. Well, maybe "envied" is better than "despised," but I just couldn't believe how ridiculously good those Oilers teams were -- Glenn Anderson, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Grant Fuhr, Andy Moog, Paul Coffey, Kevin Lowe -- oh, yeah, and some guy named Gretzky...

The fact that my homeroom teacher was from Edmonton didn't help, either...

Calgary did get a ring in 1989, although Edmonton still leads that rivalry 5-1. Meanwhile, as a Sox / Pats / Celts fan, it's great to see the Bruins pull of this victory over Vancouver. They've had some good teams and some great players over the past 39 years, but couldn't get it together until now, so congratulations to them on a hard-fought victory.

This also brings the New England-area professional franchises full circle, as each has won at least one championship over a 10-year period (or, more accurately, 9 years and four months), or a total of 7 titles, not to mention some runner-up finishes. On top of that, with a few exceptions, the Pats have been serious contenders every year since 2001, the Sox since the Henry group bought the team, the Celtics since the Garnett trade, and now the Bruins.

Maybe somebody with more time to research this can correct me, but I don't believe that any major sports market has held all four major titles within the span of a decade. Pretty remarkable. Now back to baseball...

Saturday, April 02, 2011

Type-cast

For some reason Blogger isn't inserting paragraphs. Maybe that's my punishment for taking two months off...

Louuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu....

Former Red Sox General Manager James "Lou" Gorman, who was part of the organization in some capacity for nearly 30 years in various capacities for various ownership entities has gone to the great front office in the sky. Lou is most remembers for helping to create a competitive team in the late 1980's, resulting in playoff appearance in '86, '88 and '90, when it wasn't as easy to get into the postseason as it is today. The Boston Globe has coverage here, here and here. Like any prominent member of a prominent franchise with a once-legendary and prolonged history of coming up short, Lou took a lot of heat for plenty of stuff, not all of which was his fault. Certainly he can't be blamed for John MacNamara's brain cramp in 1986, and although he gave up two future all-stars to get Mike Boddicker in 1988, it was Boddicker that helped Boston to two more division titles. Trading future HOFer Jeff Bagwell for one month of Larry Andersen in 1990 certainly hurt, but I never really held that against him. Boston had a chance to make it to the World Series that year, and at the time of the trade Sox closer Jeff Reardon was presumably out for the season with a ruptured disc, and Boston needed bullpen help. Bagwell was a AA prospect behind another HOFer, Wade Boggs, and Scott Cooper at AAA. Yeah, Gorman and his scouts missed on this one, but sometimes you have to roll the dice. Hard to remember these days, but for many years the Red Sox had a policy of not signing Type-A Free Agents, as they preferred to build their organization through trades, reclamation projects, and good draft picks. That worked in 1986, and also in 1988, when they fielded an entirely home-grown lineup for most of the season -- unheard of today. Prior to 1990, Boston got into the Free Agent game signing both Tony Pena and the aforementioned Reardon, both of whom played key roles in that division title. Unfortunately, future signings (Jack Clark, Matt Young, Danny Darwin, Frank Viola...) tended to be past their prime and generally fell short of expectations; meanwhile, the Sox lost key contributors like Bruce Hurst and Boddicker to free agency while they still had something left. In the view of this reporter, Gorman's biggest blunder -- to the extent he can be held responsible for this -- was the firing of Joe Morgan at the end of the 1991 season, when the Sox finished behind Toronto for the division title due in large part to a number of key injuries and subpar seasons from some of the players mentioned above. Nonetheless, Roger Clemens won his third Cy Young Award and the Sox had a strong young nucleus including rookie sensation Maurice "Mo" Vaughn. Morgan had one year left on his contract and no clear successor, yet someone pulled the trigger, Gorman made the announcement, an overmatched and unready Butch Hobson was promoted from AAA, and the Sox sunk into last place for the next three seasons. Gorman was subsequently succeded by another native New Englander, Dan Duquette, and the rebuilding began again, but not before Gorman signed a young prospect from North Carolina -- his given name was Christopher, but he went by an abbreviation of his middle name "Trotman." Trot Nixon, who would be the one Gorman-era holdover ten years later when the Sox hoisted their first big banner since 1918. Thanks for the memories, Lou.

Dwight Evans might like this...

Charter members of the VRWC who also have an interest in the the occasional athletic endeavor may find this new blog interesting over at NRO. Enjoy!

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Playoffs - Day 1

I didn't have any favorites (or any collateral interest) in Saturday's games, but I found it interesting that the teams that lost did so due, at least in part, to some very conservative coaching strategy --

In the NFC game, the Saints trailed by 7 points with about 9:13 left in regulation. With a 4th down at about the Seahawk's 4 yard line, they elected to go for a field goal to cut the deficit to 4 points. As it happened, a short time later the Seahawks scored a TD on Marshawn Lynch's highlight-reel run. That made it 41-30 Seahawks. The Saints were able to muster a TD late, but botched the onside kick and ended up losing 41-36.

Granted, there were 9 minutes left, but a FG does you no good in that situation. If you fail on the TD, you have your opponent deep in their own territory and an excellent chance to get the ball back with good field position.

In the AFC game, the Irsays trailed the J!E!S!T! 14-10 with 4:37 left and had 4th-and-6 from the J!E!S!T! 14 yard line. They elected to go for a FG to make it 14-13. They were lucky enough to get the ball back and kick another FG to take the lead 16-14 with 0:53 left, but some shoddy special teams and defensive play enabled the J!E!S!T! to get down the field and kick a FG to win 17-16 as time expired.

Again, the first FG (at 4:37) does the Irsays no good in that situation -- they still trail, and there's no guarantee you'll get the ball back (the J!E!S!T! had just completed a 10-minute drive on their previous possession). See Saints, above -- your opponent will have the ball deep in their own territory even if you fail at the 4th-down conversion. As it happened, they did get the ball back in time to take the lead, but only by a 2-point margin, which was easily overcome by the eventual winners. Conversely, a TD with about 4 minutes left gives the Irsays a 17-14 lead, and then the either add a FG for a 6-point lead or the J!E!S!T! tie it up with their last-second FG.

In any case, I had no stake, tangible or intangible, in either game, but I watched both of them and found it interesting that both outcomes occurred in very similar fashion. You never know what's going to happen or how the rest of the game plays out, but winners sometimes have to take risks when their season is on the line.