
HOOSIERS is the greatest movie ever made. Consequently, I've seen it about 30 times, and, in fact, just watched it a few weeks ago. Last night I watched Glory Road.
The parallels are obvious -- both are basketball-themed movies about underdog teams with a fairly predictable conclusion. Both are based on true stories, but each takes a fair number of liberties for dramatic and other purposes. While I'm sure that Jerry Bruckenheimer (producer) and James Gartner (director) had seen HOOSIERS, I'm equally sure they endeavored to make their own movie. Nonetheless, it was difficult to watch Glory Road and not see countless cinemagraphic similarities between the two. Maybe unavoidable, but hard to miss.
Glory Road is a good enough movie -- the drama is there, of course, and I was pleasantly surprised that there was literally no profanity (the PG rating is due to the racial themes and related scenes). It did, however, have a few disappointments --
(1) In one of the early games, the team is struggling and the players beg their coach to let them play "their game" -- finally, the coach gives in, and the team wins. All's well that ends well, but Coach Norman Dale would have never done this.
(2) Even allowing a reasonable amount of license, Glory Road takes a number that are unnecessary and could have been easily avoided -- making one wonder if their intent was to be misleading. The "Goofs" list from IMDB highlights several outright mistakes about logos, team names, conferences, and players, but most notably are the liberties taken with Coach Haskins' biography -- 1.) Haskins didn't come to Texas Western directly from being a high school girl's coach 2.) the team was already integrated before he got there 3.) the group of black players he recruited weren't part of the same class 4.) the team didn't win a national championship until Haskins' fourth year at the school 5.) Haskins started coaching there in 1961, not 1965.
I'm quite sure they could have built a pretty good screenplay around the actual facts, so I'm puzzled as to why they made these rather significant changes. The skeptic in me wonders if the filmakers were traying to make the racial crisis in west Texas in 1965 worse than it really was, but I don't know why they would have to do that.