Friday, September 09, 2011

Required Reading -- Never Forget

AT WAR

The first great war of the 21st Century began September 11, [2001], seemingly out of the blue. The United States is a target because we are powerful, rich, and good. We are resented for our power, envied for our wealth, and hated for our liberty.

Few wars begin like their predecessors. The wars of the last century opened with thrusts into Belgium or Poland, a surprise attack on battleships, a lurch in Kuwait, a steadily accreting campaign of jungle murder. This war began with four hijacked airplanes targeted at the Pentagon, Camp David, and the two World Trade Towers.

No one should think of this as terrorism, which is the effort to spread death and dismay among civilian populations. Much death and grief ensued, but the targets were precisely picked to incarnate American power, democracy, and wealth. The September Massacres were a rational attempt to thwart the will and depress the spirits of the United States.

Our enemies have proximate motives, as political and military actors always do. But let no one imagine that any American policy or lack of it, or any change in our ethnic or religious makeup, could have insulated us from such a strike. The United States is hated because we are, indeed, powerful, rich, and good. Like the temples of Rome sacked by the barbarians, or the Greenwich Observatory that was the target of anarchists in Joseph Conrad's Secret Agent, our national headquarters and totems excite the fear and wrath of those in the world who feel themselves shortchanged. For this historical moment, anyone who has a quarrel with the status quo will find us, with varying degrees of truth, somehow implicated in his discontents. Our exposure to these emotions is an unavoidable badge of honor.

Because this was an act of war, its agents must not be pursued by resolutions, lawsuits, or any of the other legalistic and diplomatic devices by which we have tried to combat terrorists in the recent past. President Bush's and Secretary of State Powell's early talk of "hunting down" the perpetrators is incomplete. These are not traffic violators to be given a desk ticket at the night court of The Hague. After the time it takes to guess the attackers' commanders, which should not be long, those commanders, and their allies and patrons, should be paved over. If our retaliatory strikes hit a few of the world's warriors who happened not to be involved in this war, that will be no great loss.

News reports showed dancing in the streets of Middle Eastern cities, graphic proof that our enemies are not restricted to cadres of ideologues or leaders. Striking the war-making capacity of hostile nations may involve clearing some of those streets. When that happens, we should not shrink. Our European allies have, in many cases, battened off deals with rogue states. They should be told that, if they continue to do so, their assets in this country may be appropriated to repair the damage done to Washington and New York City.

The vacation that began with the end of the Cold War ended with the summer of 2001. All the twittering about lockboxes, tax cuts, and compassionate this and that; all the chatter about world structures and emerging mobocracies, was the sound of locusts. The first duty of the state is to protect the national security. Salus populi suprema lex. We need our diplomats, not to attend conferences and solve the world's problems, but to cut deals that are to our advantage and explain the consequences of actions that are not; we need our military resources, not to run elections and perform social work in the BedStuys and Appalachias of the world, but to punish offenses and intimidate enemies.

The September Massacres would not, of course, have been stopped by missile defense. They were not stopped by aircraft carriers. Does that mean we should have none? No great power seems to have been actively involved, but that does not mean that a great power might not threaten one day to send four warheads somewhere. We must be prepared to meet that threat, as we prepare to repel further attacks of this kind. Such an operation was not the work of a handful of men; there had to be coordination, planning, support. Our intelligence was woefully lacking; our domestic defense capabilities need to be addressed.

Grievous as our losses have been, America has suffered worse in its history, in both pride and blood. The enemy once occupied Washington and burned the White House; the greatest killers of Americans were brother Americans in the Civil War. The systems and the character that emerged from those torments will emerge from this. The world, we have been taught, is always full of competing views. In the intellectual pine barrens of the West, there are anarchist and neo-Communist stirrings. Islam harbors a fundamentalist strain, a minority even in the Middle East, a small minority worldwide. China is modernizing the Asian road to despotism—a very old road; Confucius warned against it. These options lead to poverty and tyranny. The United States, for all its follies and sins, is the best the world has to offer.

We should therefore be of good cheer. In the darkest early days of World War II Winston Churchill told British diplomats on the European continent to light their windows, to hold the usual functions, to conduct themselves with confidence and spirit. No skulking in bunkers or military bases for him, or for us. Schedule the rebuilding of our wasted icons. Our fellow citizens are lost, but the steel and glass will come back. When it does we will hang out a million flags.

— Editors, National Review, September 13, 2001

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Killer B's

I only started following sports with any seriousness in the mid-1980's, and to the extent I followed professional hockey at all, my favorite team was the Calgary Flames. I had never been to Calgary (still haven't), and didn't know anybody who was, but I stuck with them because I absolutely despised the Edmonton Oilers. Well, maybe "envied" is better than "despised," but I just couldn't believe how ridiculously good those Oilers teams were -- Glenn Anderson, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Grant Fuhr, Andy Moog, Paul Coffey, Kevin Lowe -- oh, yeah, and some guy named Gretzky...

The fact that my homeroom teacher was from Edmonton didn't help, either...

Calgary did get a ring in 1989, although Edmonton still leads that rivalry 5-1. Meanwhile, as a Sox / Pats / Celts fan, it's great to see the Bruins pull of this victory over Vancouver. They've had some good teams and some great players over the past 39 years, but couldn't get it together until now, so congratulations to them on a hard-fought victory.

This also brings the New England-area professional franchises full circle, as each has won at least one championship over a 10-year period (or, more accurately, 9 years and four months), or a total of 7 titles, not to mention some runner-up finishes. On top of that, with a few exceptions, the Pats have been serious contenders every year since 2001, the Sox since the Henry group bought the team, the Celtics since the Garnett trade, and now the Bruins.

Maybe somebody with more time to research this can correct me, but I don't believe that any major sports market has held all four major titles within the span of a decade. Pretty remarkable. Now back to baseball...

Saturday, April 02, 2011

Type-cast

For some reason Blogger isn't inserting paragraphs. Maybe that's my punishment for taking two months off...

Louuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu....

Former Red Sox General Manager James "Lou" Gorman, who was part of the organization in some capacity for nearly 30 years in various capacities for various ownership entities has gone to the great front office in the sky. Lou is most remembers for helping to create a competitive team in the late 1980's, resulting in playoff appearance in '86, '88 and '90, when it wasn't as easy to get into the postseason as it is today. The Boston Globe has coverage here, here and here. Like any prominent member of a prominent franchise with a once-legendary and prolonged history of coming up short, Lou took a lot of heat for plenty of stuff, not all of which was his fault. Certainly he can't be blamed for John MacNamara's brain cramp in 1986, and although he gave up two future all-stars to get Mike Boddicker in 1988, it was Boddicker that helped Boston to two more division titles. Trading future HOFer Jeff Bagwell for one month of Larry Andersen in 1990 certainly hurt, but I never really held that against him. Boston had a chance to make it to the World Series that year, and at the time of the trade Sox closer Jeff Reardon was presumably out for the season with a ruptured disc, and Boston needed bullpen help. Bagwell was a AA prospect behind another HOFer, Wade Boggs, and Scott Cooper at AAA. Yeah, Gorman and his scouts missed on this one, but sometimes you have to roll the dice. Hard to remember these days, but for many years the Red Sox had a policy of not signing Type-A Free Agents, as they preferred to build their organization through trades, reclamation projects, and good draft picks. That worked in 1986, and also in 1988, when they fielded an entirely home-grown lineup for most of the season -- unheard of today. Prior to 1990, Boston got into the Free Agent game signing both Tony Pena and the aforementioned Reardon, both of whom played key roles in that division title. Unfortunately, future signings (Jack Clark, Matt Young, Danny Darwin, Frank Viola...) tended to be past their prime and generally fell short of expectations; meanwhile, the Sox lost key contributors like Bruce Hurst and Boddicker to free agency while they still had something left. In the view of this reporter, Gorman's biggest blunder -- to the extent he can be held responsible for this -- was the firing of Joe Morgan at the end of the 1991 season, when the Sox finished behind Toronto for the division title due in large part to a number of key injuries and subpar seasons from some of the players mentioned above. Nonetheless, Roger Clemens won his third Cy Young Award and the Sox had a strong young nucleus including rookie sensation Maurice "Mo" Vaughn. Morgan had one year left on his contract and no clear successor, yet someone pulled the trigger, Gorman made the announcement, an overmatched and unready Butch Hobson was promoted from AAA, and the Sox sunk into last place for the next three seasons. Gorman was subsequently succeded by another native New Englander, Dan Duquette, and the rebuilding began again, but not before Gorman signed a young prospect from North Carolina -- his given name was Christopher, but he went by an abbreviation of his middle name "Trotman." Trot Nixon, who would be the one Gorman-era holdover ten years later when the Sox hoisted their first big banner since 1918. Thanks for the memories, Lou.

Dwight Evans might like this...

Charter members of the VRWC who also have an interest in the the occasional athletic endeavor may find this new blog interesting over at NRO. Enjoy!

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Playoffs - Day 1

I didn't have any favorites (or any collateral interest) in Saturday's games, but I found it interesting that the teams that lost did so due, at least in part, to some very conservative coaching strategy --

In the NFC game, the Saints trailed by 7 points with about 9:13 left in regulation. With a 4th down at about the Seahawk's 4 yard line, they elected to go for a field goal to cut the deficit to 4 points. As it happened, a short time later the Seahawks scored a TD on Marshawn Lynch's highlight-reel run. That made it 41-30 Seahawks. The Saints were able to muster a TD late, but botched the onside kick and ended up losing 41-36.

Granted, there were 9 minutes left, but a FG does you no good in that situation. If you fail on the TD, you have your opponent deep in their own territory and an excellent chance to get the ball back with good field position.

In the AFC game, the Irsays trailed the J!E!S!T! 14-10 with 4:37 left and had 4th-and-6 from the J!E!S!T! 14 yard line. They elected to go for a FG to make it 14-13. They were lucky enough to get the ball back and kick another FG to take the lead 16-14 with 0:53 left, but some shoddy special teams and defensive play enabled the J!E!S!T! to get down the field and kick a FG to win 17-16 as time expired.

Again, the first FG (at 4:37) does the Irsays no good in that situation -- they still trail, and there's no guarantee you'll get the ball back (the J!E!S!T! had just completed a 10-minute drive on their previous possession). See Saints, above -- your opponent will have the ball deep in their own territory even if you fail at the 4th-down conversion. As it happened, they did get the ball back in time to take the lead, but only by a 2-point margin, which was easily overcome by the eventual winners. Conversely, a TD with about 4 minutes left gives the Irsays a 17-14 lead, and then the either add a FG for a 6-point lead or the J!E!S!T! tie it up with their last-second FG.

In any case, I had no stake, tangible or intangible, in either game, but I watched both of them and found it interesting that both outcomes occurred in very similar fashion. You never know what's going to happen or how the rest of the game plays out, but winners sometimes have to take risks when their season is on the line.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Long Overdue

Tim Wakefield -- who just completed his 16th season in Boston -- has won the Roberto Clemente award on his 8th attempt, in recognition of his charity work and community service. I actually thougth he had won this already, so it's about time...

He won't make it into Cooperstown without a ticket, but he will definitely be inducted into the Red Sox Hall of Fame when / if he retires, and with this post I'd like to officially begin the campaign that the Red Sox retire his #49 at that time.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Twenty-two years ago today...

...this happened. I was in my college dorm room, forced to listen to the broadcast on a blurry AM station because the floor TV was tied up by a bunch of muscle-heads watching professional wrestling. We didn't have ESPN, and it would be months until I saw the replay.

My favorite part is watching the brake lights flash on outside the right-field wall as the ball flies over Jose Canseco's head. Never, never, never leave a baseball game early -- even in Chavez Ravine.

BTW -- this was Gibson's only plate appearance in the Series.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Woodrow's Magic Kingdom


Disney World's Magic Kingdom includes a "Hall of Presidents," which I naturally visited on my recent trip to Orlando. The 22-minute presentation is a cross between the informative and the innocuous -- done well enough and edited strategically to avoid offending too many people. I was more struck by the lobby preceding the presentation, which contains portraits of selected chief executives and a handful of artifacts.

Some of the portraits are predictable -- the original George W., along with Honest Abe and Old Hickory are given prominent positions, and rightly so. There are two other sets of three portraits each -- on one side of the doorway you find FDR, James Monroe, and Jimmy Carter. On the other side are Ronald Reagan, Thomas Jefferson, and Woodrow Wilson. Coincidentally or otherwise, each trio contains a great president, an above-average president, and a total failure, the evaluation corresponding to the order listed above.

While presidential ranking is certainly subjective, few unbiased historians would disagree on five of the six. All had flaws, of course, but Reagan and FDR came to office in the midst of great crisis and succeeded beyond all expectations through a combination of strong leadership and firm (if controversial) policies. Jefferson had the Louisiana Purchase, but is more noted for his accomplishments outside the White House, while Monroe presided over an even-handed eight years but with few memorable successes outside of his famous Doctrine. Carter, on the other hand, inherited a tenuous situation and made it far worse (paving the way for the aforementioned Reagan), and is now regarded as little more than an interregnum during 60-plus years of otherwise competent national leadership.

Which brings us to Thomas Woodrow Wilson, perhaps the most over-rated of them all. Others, should they choose to, can give their opinion; mine should be rather clear at this point. I recently completed When the Cheering Stopped: The Last Years of Woodrow Wilson by Gene Smith (1964), which focuses on Wilson’s administration following the Armistice of 11/11/1918, and specifically his years after his unfortunate illness late in his second term.

It’s an easy read and worth the time – even for an anti-Wilsonian as myself, and Smith clearly tries to paint an unbiased portrait of his subject. Again, others can evaluate Wilson on the totality of his record. I was struck, in this work, by a number of factors that I believe contributed to the overall failure of his administration –

- A supreme overconfidence in his own abilities
- Widespread exaltation outside the United States, with only tepid (and often orchestrated) cheering at home
- An absolute unwillingness to accommodate other points of view, specifically on the domestic front, and complete shunning of any attempts at compromise.

Per Smith, Wilson was almost totally incapacitated in his final years in office, made few decisions, signed few documents, attended few meetings and made almost no public appearances. Yet he persisted in excluding not only his political enemies – which might have been understandable – but his allies and members of his own administration, including his vice president and cabinet, in any of the operations of the executive branch. If that’s not enough, he in all seriousness considered running for a third term (not yet prohibited via the 22nd Amendment), and then gave thought to running again in 1924 (the year in which he died).

It was a combination of these factors that led to Wilson’s grandest failure, that of the US Congress refusing to ratify the Versailles Treaty. The introduction to Smith’s book, by another writer and displaying significant favorable bias in contrast to the body of the book, insinuates that the country’s refusal to follow Wilson into the League of Nation was a tragic mistake, leading naturally to World War II, and proving, he believes, that Wilson was right all along. Debatable, to say the least, but the larger point, that Smith goes on to make, is that the US could have entered the League had Wilson showed as much diplomatic skill domestically as he displayed on the international stage at Versailles.

C'Mon, Yahoo -- really!

Here's today baseball playoff schedule, including one series that wrapped up last night, and one that is 2-1.

Saturday, October 09, 2010

Yahoo?

Interesting that the Giants can lead a series 1-0 after they lost a game 5-4.

And Yahoo! wonders why it can't catch up with Google...

Friday, October 08, 2010

The Colbert Democrats

The Colbert Democrats - Charles Krauthammer - National Review Online

Charles Krauthammer offers a clear and succinct summary of the current situation.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Inappropriate

This was disgraceful, embarassing, unbearable, and inappropriate. The aide (or, heaven forbid, elected official) who suggested and/or arranged this should be sentenced to a lifetime of writing the complete transcripts of all of Al Gore's speeches on a neverending blackboard with their fingernails.

Whatever the intent, whatever the point, it epically fails on every level -- as an exercise in citizen testimony, as a perspective on a serious public policy issue, and, perhaps most significantly, as an attempt at humor. Would you believe that the Chairman of the committee is running unopposed for re-election (the only unopposed House member in California)? Is it too late to start a write-in campaign?

File this one under "Edsel." Good grief.

Friday, September 24, 2010

30 Years Ago


Scavenging through a pile of magazines at a yard sale last week, I stumbled across the depicted, which I immediately seized for the rather fair price of $0.25.


Those of us who remember the dismal years of the 1970's will always have a special place in our memories for the 1980 US Olympic Hockey Team, and their recognition as Sports Illustrated's "Sportsmen of the Year" comes complete with a 12-page (!) article on the team's selection, development, and road to success, complete with individual pictures of all 20 players and head coach Herb Brooks in their disposition as of late 1980, less than a year after Lake Placid.


A remarkable piece of nostalgia, with the "where are they now?" angle rather ironic today in light of the passage of 30 years. While the cover story was certainly worth the purchase price (to say the least), the magazine contains numerous other bits that tweak the old brain cells, including:
- A masthead featuring Robert W. Creamer, Frank Deford, Curry Kirkpatrick, and Dan Jenkins.
- Ubiquitous tobacco and alcohol ads, including the perennial "Merry Christmas from Marlboro Country."
- Other ads touting Enterprise Radio, HBO,
- An article on the Phoenix suns featuring a page-length color photograph of the late Hall-of-Famer Dennis Johnson in a Phoenix uniform.
- An article on the baseball winter meetings that mentions trade talk surrounding Fred Lynn, Bobby Bonds, Rick Burleson and Ron Guidry.
- An ad featuring the 1980 Kodak All-America Football team, which included Jim McMahon, Herschel Walker, Lawrence Taylor, Mark May, Mike Singletary, and Ron Lott.
- And, finally, on page 92, an editorial proposing a Division I-A College Football playoff system. Seriously.
The more things change...

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Leadership

Conrad Black in National Review provides an excellent evaluation of FDR's strategies and tactics dealing with the crises this country faced eighty years ago, as contasted with current approaches. His point how FDR's reputation has suffered more damage at the hands of historians that supposedly shared his ideology is also worth pondering.

If nothing else, read the third paragraph from the end.

The two greatest presidents of the last century were FDR and Ronaldus Maximus (with the other Roosevelt not far behind) -- not on the bases of politics, programs, or policies, but because of consistent and strong leadership in the face of unprecedented challenges, and, in both cases, with tenures following periods of weak and/or crippled leadership in the Oval Office. Is it any wonder that the latter greatly admired the former and quoted him often, or that many fair-minded conservatives (both those who lived through the 1930's and those, like Black, who have actually studied it), rate FDR very high in spite of ideological differences? (Differences, which Black points out, were not nearly as extreme as Schlessinger et al might lead us to believe).

Leadership is not a title or an office -- it is the ability to build broad support without compromising basic principles, carry out those policies effectively, change them when necessary, and admit error if it doesn't work. Read the article.

Friday, July 16, 2010

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

King George (the Last) (1930-2010)

I have to admit I'm of mixed minds on this one -- not his death, of course, which is tragic and apparently somewhat sudden, but rather his life, specifically his life in baseball.

Owner of the NY Yankees for approximately the same time period I've been a Boston Red Sox fan, George Steinbrenner embodied everything that was despicable about the Evil Empire -- too much money, unbridled spending, unadulterated arrogance and exaggerated tiresome legends of the gloried past and amped-up tradition. You would think the Yankees invented Major League Baseball and then invited the rest of the teams to join them just so they wouldn't be stuck playing intra-squad games all season. It was once said that New Englanders saw Steinbrenner as the Darth Vader of baseball. That was probably true, up until about 15 years ago, when he began his slow devolution into Dr. Doofenshmirtz.

But credit where credit is due -- he took a tarnished baseball franchise and bankrolled 7 more championships, restoring much of the glory and fielding a contender nearly every year. After his second suspension, he finally recognized his own limitations and began to hire quality baseball people around him, culminating in Joe Torre in 1996. He was a true capitalist, a patriot, and a humanitarian, who, by all reports, never turned away those in need. This included the Red Sox charity of choice, the Jimmy Fund. His team's run of four championships from 1996-2000 was compiled by a roster that was largely home-grown, an accomplishment that even the most jaded Yankee Hater had to grudgingly admire. 2009, of course, was a different story, with the Yankees stopping just short of acquiring entire team rosters to augment their own, but the core players from the late 90's remained.

Certainly his pomposity and arrogance got him into trouble more than once -- Yogi Berra comes to mind, not to mention Richard Nixon -- and his erratic dealings with Billy Martin (who was an absolutely dreadful manager) were downright comical. I also found it odd that the Yankees trotted him out as the marquee symbol of their franchise at the 2008 All-Star Game, when it's typically a legendary player that is given this honor.

Twenty years ago, the Yankees were at their nadir, finishing dead last in the old AL East under a managerial tandem of Bucky Dent and Stump Merrill. Their only whiff of contention came in their games against the Blue Jays and Red Sox. During one such contest the announcer -- a graduate of the University of Maine and an admitted Sox fan -- conceded that "baseball needs the Yankees." It's hard to disagree -- what fun is there in hating (of beating) a team that stinks? I could have done without the obscene spending spree that they've been on the past ten years or so, but having them in contention certainly makes the season more interesting.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

History

The stage was set -- the Boston Celtics had won the NBA Championship two seasons earlier; now the LA Lakers were back in the Finals, looking to repeat from their Championship of the year before. They lost a game at home early in the series, but rebounded to win one on the road and return home down 3-2 for the final two games.

Sound familiar?

That was in 1988. 22 years ago. The reason I bring this up -- as this year's Game 6 is barely underway -- is to remind myself that I was actually pulling for the Lakers that year as they squared off against the Detroit Pistons. There were reasons -- (1) I had a good friend who was a Lakers fan -- (2) They weren't playing the Celtics -- (3) They were playing the Pistons (Bill Laimbeer, Isiah Thomas, enough said) -- (4) The Pistons, in addition to their many other flaws, had just beaten the Celtics in the Eastern Conference Finals -- (5) And, quite honestly, in addition to being highly talented, that was (in my view) a very likable Lakers team.

Fast-forward to 2010 -- Led by Kobe "Not Guilty" Bryant, Pau "buy a consonant" Gasol and Phil "X-Man" Jackson -- I cannot help but absolutely loathe this crowd. Talented, yes, but over-rated. I guess what bothers me the most is how Phil Jackson is being called the greatest coach of all time -- okay, his ten rings might get him into the top ten, but not any higher. See here for my thoughts on that a year ago. The Lakers showed their true colors as they became unravelled in Game 5, pointing and sniping and blaming each other for their collective incompetence and inferiority, while the Celtics did what all good teams do -- pass, take good shots, stick with what works and don't care who's playing or who gets the credit.

Here's hoping for #18. Good luck catching that, Phil.